0
Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

½Å±Ô°£È£»ç ÇÁ¸®¼ÁÅÍÀÇ Çٽɿª·® Æò°¡µµ±¸ °³¹ß

Development and Validation of the Ore Competence Evaluation Tool for New Graduate Nurse¢¥s Preceptor

°£È£ÇàÁ¤ÇÐȸÁö 2002³â 8±Ç 4È£ p.535 ~ 549
KMID : 0614820020080040535
±ÇÀΰ¢ ( Kwon In-Gak ) - »ï¼º¼­¿ïº´¿ø

Á¤°æÈñ ( Jung Kyung-Hee ) - »ï¼º¼­¿ïº´¿ø
Á¶Çý½½ ( Jo Hye-seul ) - »ï¼º¼­¿ïº´¿ø
ȲÁö¿ø ( Hwang Ji-Won ) - »ï¼º¼­¿ïº´¿ø
±èÁö¿µ ( Kim Ji-Yeong ) - »ï¼º¼­¿ïº´¿ø
Àü°æ¿Á ( Jeon Kyoung-Ok ) - »ï¼º¼­¿ïº´¿ø
¼º¿µÈñ ( Sung Young-Hee ) - »ï¼º¼­¿ïº´¿ø

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to develop a core competency evaluation tool of the preceptors training new graduate nurses and to determine the validity of the developed instrument.

Method: This study was conducted in 2 phases. In phase I, preceptor¢¥s core competency list was developed through literature review, focus group interview, and review by nursing directors and nurse managers. In phase II, 60 preceptors were evaluated with the developed instrument and categorized into excellent, good & poor core competency gropus. For validation of the instrument, new graduates¢¥ clinical performance improvement and satisfaction with preceptor were compared between excellent and poor group.

Result: The data were analyzed by SPSS P.C and the results were as follows.
1) Preceptor¢¥s core competencies were classified into three domains; Role model(10 items), Socialization facilitator(8 items), and Educator(16 items), and each item had four point system of ¢¥strongly agree¢¥ to ¢¥strongly disagree¢¥. Cronbach¢¥¥á of the instrument was .9416.
2) Comparison of clinical performance improvement and satisfaction with preceptor of the new graduates trained by excellent and poor preceptors revealed that new graduates¢¥ clinical performance improvement (p=.015) and satisfaction with the preceptor (p=.005) were significantly higher in the excellent core competency preceptor group than the poor core competency preceptor group.

Conclusion: The validity of the preceptor¢¥s core competency evaluation tool developed in this study was confirmed. Therefore, this tool can be effectively utilized for education and evaluation of new graduates¢¥ preceptors in clinical settings.
KeyWords
ÇÁ¸®¼ÁÅÍ, Çٽɿª·® Æò°¡µµ±¸
preceptor, core competency evaluation tool,
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
  
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI) KoreaMed